TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR : 55/PID.SUS-TPK/2014/PN.PBR TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN PERALATAN MEDIS INSTALASI MATA DAN PENUNJANG MEDIS WATER TREATMENT DI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH TELUK KUANTAN KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the Judges' considerations in issuing Judge Decisions Number: 55 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2014 / PN.PBR concerning Corruption Crimes in the Procurement of Eye Installation Medical Equipment and Water Treatment Medical Support at Teluk Kuantan Hospital, Kuantan Singingi Regency and knowing the suitability of the punishment imposed by the judge with Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes and regarding the return of state losses whether it affects this decision. Based on this research, it was found that the Defendant dr. BASRANA, B. MPH was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act of corruption. The Public Prosecutor himself charged the Defendant with the Subdistrict Indictment, where in addition to the primary charge there was also a subsidiary charge, and the judges themselves decided to try the perpetrator on the subsidiary charge, namely Article 3 Jo. Article 18 Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 as amended and supplemented by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code.