IMPLEMENTASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERUMUSAN NORMA PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN DI INDONESIA OLEH DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT
Abstract
The decision of the Constitutional Court based on Article 24C Paragraph (1) is final and binding, meaning that the Decision of the Constitutional Court is binding when pronounced and there is no legal remedy for the decision. However, in practice, the Constitutional Court Decision which clearly states a norm contradicts the 1945 Constitution, but the canceled norms are reprinted by the legislature which results in defiance of the Constitutional Court Decision. Re-loading of norms that have been canceled by the Constitutional Court is not justified in the Indonesian law. This is based on Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 10 paragraph (1) letter d jo of Article 23 paragraph (1) of Law Number 12 Year 2011.
Downloads
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking by giving appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. All of the remix, transform, or build upon the material must distribute the contributions under the same license as the original.
