Strengthening the Capacity of Village Apparatus in Supporting the Management Process of Customary Territories in Riau Province
Abstract
The management of customary (indigenous) territories in Indonesia remains a critical challenge, particularly in aligning formal governance systems with existing customary institutions. This study aims to examine the capacity of village administrative apparatuses in managing customary territories in Riau Province, focusing on five dimensions: regulatory, administrative, managerial, cultural, and conflict resolution. A qualitative descriptive-analytical approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis involving village officials, customary leaders, and relevant stakeholders. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns across capacity dimensions. The findings indicate that the capacity of village apparatuses is still suboptimal and uneven. Major weaknesses are found in regulatory understanding, administrative data management, and conflict resolution, while cultural capacity is relatively stronger but remains individualized rather than institutionalized. These limitations hinder the effective integration of formal and customary governance systems. Additionally, weak data systems, limited coordination, and reliance on informal practices further constrain governance effectiveness. This study highlights that capacity should be understood as a multidimensional and adaptive concept. Therefore, strengthening capacity requires an integrative, contextual, and sustainable approach, combining individual competency development, institutional reform, and governance system improvement. Enhancing village capacity is essential to achieving inclusive and sustainable customary territory governance
Downloads
References
[2] C. Ansell and J. Torfing, “Co-creation: The new kid on the block in public governance,” Policy & Politics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 211–230, 2021.
[3] A. Agger, “Democratic innovations in municipal planning,” Cities, vol. 117, p. 103317, 2021.
[4] M. Acar, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, “Public value outcomes of co-creation,” Public Management Review, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1–33, 2023.
[5] C. Ansell, E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing, “The democratic quality of co-creation,” Public Policy and Administration, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 149–170, 2024.
[6] J. Ege, C. Kaiser, and R. Steiner, “Explaining patterns of co-creation in local governance,” Public Management Review, 2025.
[7] M. N. Budiyanto et al., “Digital transformation and public value creation,” in Proc. IAPA Conf., 2025.
[8] S. Hajar and N. A. Arma, “Co-creating public value in village governance,” Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024.
[9] M. Rizki and A. Hendarman, “Participatory governance in digital budgeting,” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 6, 2024.
[10] J. Ege, “Local governance and citizen participation,” Public Management Review, 2025.
[11] D. Cepiku et al., “Co-production and public governance trends,” Public Administration Review, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 345–360, 2023.
[12] S. P. Osborne, “Public service logic and co-production,” Public Management Review, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1407–1426, 2021.
[13] J. Torfing, “Collaborative innovation in the public sector,” Public Administration, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 701–717, 2021.
[14] E. Sørensen and J. Torfing, “Interactive governance and democracy,” Policy Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2022.
[15] T. Nabatchi, A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia, “Public participation and co-creation,” Public Administration Review, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 555–567, 2022.
[16] T. Bovaird and E. Loeffler, “Co-production in public services,” International Public Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 846–870, 2021.
[17] T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, and T. Steen, “Co-creation and value generation,” Public Management Review, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1025–1043, 2022.
[18] W. H. Voorberg, V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers, “Drivers and barriers of co-creation,” Public Management Review, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2021.
[19] V. Pestoff, “Co-production and citizen involvement,” Voluntas, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 363–376, 2022.
[20] OECD, Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
[21] World Bank, Citizen Engagement in Public Service Delivery. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022.
[22] UNDP, Digital Governance and Public Value Creation. New York: UNDP, 2023.
[23] T. A. Börzel, “Multi-level governance in public policy,” Journal of Public Administration, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2023.
[24] D. M. Ramjit, “Digital governance and human capital,” Contemporary Public Administration Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88–102, 2025.
[25] H. Lakadawala et al., “Blockchain and polycentric governance,” Public Administration Review, 2026.
[26] N. Rizun et al., “Text analytics in co-creation research,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, 2023.
