ANALISIS YURIDIS WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN UTANG PIUTANG BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/Pdt.G/2019/PN TLK)

Abstract

Events that occur in the implementation of debt-receivable agreements are often the debt that must be paid does not run smoothly according to what has been agreed. The debtor can be considered to have defaulted on the agreed debt agreement. Problem formulation 1) what is the legal responsibility if one of the parties defaults on the debt-receivable agreement? 2. what is the judge's consideration in making a decision on a case of default in the loan and credit agreement (study verdict number 12 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN TLk. As in the case contained in Decision Number: 12 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN TLK. The verdict stated that the Defendant was proven to have defaulted on the debt agreement with the Plaintiff, so that the Defendant was sentenced to give / surrender the plaintiff's right, namely a plot of land along with a permanent house on it to the plaintiff. , namely judges' considerations that are juridical in nature and judges' considerations that are non-juridical in nature.Juridical considerations are judges' considerations based on factors that have been revealed in the trial and by law it has been determined as things that must be contained in a decision